Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Are you TOUGH ENOUGH for Joanna Angel? EXPO 2014, August 24-27, Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas
   
 

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Columns
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Interviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Swinger Vacations!

Eva Angelina at Twistys

June 25, 2002 05:59am
House OKs Rewritten Internet Child-Porn Ban
Source: Reuters
by: Andy Sullivan

(WASHINGTON, DC) -- Barely two months after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a ban on "virtual" child pornography, the House of Representatives on Tuesday passed another attempt to update child-porn laws for the Internet age.

The House passed 413-8 a bill that would outlaw pornographic digital images of children, unless they were proven to be computer-generated simulations that did not portray actual underage sex.

The Supreme Court struck down a similar law on free-speech grounds in April, saying it was too broadly written and could outlaw mainstream films like "Traffic" and "Romeo and Juliet" that use adult actors to portray teenage sex.

Backers said a rewritten bill was necessary to effectively prosecute the child-pornography trade, which has migrated to the Internet over the past several years.

Without a virtual-porn ban, prosecutors must prove that child pornography seized from Web sites and computer hard drives portrays actual children, a difficult proposition once a picture has been scanned into a computer and passed around the Internet, said bill sponsor Rep. Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican.

The Supreme Court's decision has made existing child-porn cases harder to prosecute and could throw previous convictions in jeopardy, others said.

"With every passing day another pedophile escapes prosecution because of the flawed ruling of this high court," said Florida Republican Rep. Mark Foley, a bill co-sponsor.

But Rep. Bobby Scott, a Virginia Democrat, said Congress was wasting its time with another effort that would not survive a courtroom challenge.

"This bill just reiterates the mistakes in the original legislation," Scott said.

The Bush administration issued a statement supporting the bill's passage, saying it "would be an important step in protecting children from abuse by ensuring effective child pornography prosecutions."

The issue now must be taken up by the Senate, where similar but separate bills have been introduced by Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch and Missouri Democratic Sen. Jean Carnahan. A hearing is scheduled in the Judiciary Committee ( news - web sites) in the summer, a Carnahan spokesman said.

Courts Struck Down Earlier Attempts

Congress has so far had little success writing laws that limit pornography on the Internet that do not infringe on free-speech rights. Federal courts have struck down three previous attempts to regulate online smut on First Amendment grounds.

The rewritten bill, drafted by the Justice Department ( news - web sites) in response to the Supreme Court's ruling, applies only to computer images that are "indistinguishable" from child pornography, not just material that "appears to be" child porn. It does not apply to mainstream movies, cartoons, drawings or other works that are not realistic digital images.

Pornography involving prepubescent children would be outlawed entirely, "virtual" or not.

The bill would flip the burden of proof so that the defendant would be required to prove that the image was a computer-generated fake, rather than requiring prosecutors to prove that it involved real, identifiable children.

Bill sponsors said they were confident that their new bill would pass judicial review, and that without such an "affirmative defense" they would be incapable of prosecuting digital child pornography.

But Scott and Rep. Jerry Nadler, a New York Republican, said most child pornography could be prosecuted under existing obscenity laws. The bill still could be struck down on First Amendment grounds because it would threaten documentary filmmakers, therapists and others who use computer images for legitimate purposes, they said.

"The government may not suppress lawful speech to suppress unlawful speech," Nadler said.

The House also approved 409-3 a bill that would allow judges to require lifetime monitoring of sex offenders after they serve their prison terms.

Are you TOUGH ENOUGH for Joanna Angel?

Related Stories

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content

Casey Cumz 03

See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

Nikki's Fit as Phoenix

Vivid Extends Patrick Hosting

Fake Test Results

Angelyne on Amber Lynn's RNSU

Red Cardinal Wraps Betrothed

Siri Wins Round 2

J.Lo Doc Johnson Offer

Stripclub Microbrewery on CNN

Father's Day ~ Reviewer Rated

Our Father ~ Reviewer Rated

Nikki Phoenix Album Released

Passport to Hustler Event

Fox News Wasteland

Asianmodelpalooza 14

Nikki Phoenix Appearances

Nikki Phoenix Karaoke XXX

Nina Elle Retains Star Factory

Tasha Reign Grads UCLA

Tera Patrick Hosts Vivid Radio

It's Just Work

Traci Bryant Goes Legal

CET Free Panel Month

Miss LA Karaoke XXX

Freedom Acres Location

Summer Lovers

Nikki Delano at Centerfolds

Karen Summer Returns

Advertise on AINews

Cytherea Auctions Fan Scene

Entertainment is Entertainment is Entertainment

More
Stories From

Law & Politics

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit

ASACP at XBIZ 360

Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Alia Janine Against Measure B

Fight Measure B

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

John Stagliano Keynotes CatalystCon

Hirsch Blasts Trueman

Hirsch Cautions GOP

LATATA Files Injunction

Child Porn Hotline Increased

Vette Scores on AFF

Nicole Houde Assault Arrest

YouJizz Sued

Dickinson Defends Travolta

Kardashian/Humphries Divorce Deposition

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

     
Copyright © 1998 - 2014 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).