Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world Elementary Public Relations Consulting and Press Release Service

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Nudist Vacations!

Club Jessica Jaymes - Official Website

October 30, 2001 02:15pm
Supreme Court Discusses Porn Depicting Minors
Source: Reuters
by: James Vicini

(WASHINGTON, DC) -- The U.S. Supreme Court [http://www.SupremeCourtUS.gov] questioned on Tuesday whether a law aimed at computer-generated pictures that "convey the impression of child pornography" may be applied to popular, award-winning movies such as "Traffic," "Lolita," "Romeo and Juliet" and "Titanic."

The justices grappled with a 1996 federal law covering computer-generated images that do not involve real children and whether it may be applied to very young adult actors and actresses who look like minors in a movie.

Justice Stephen Breyer cited "Traffic" [http://TrafficTheMovie.com] with the scene of the high school daughter of the nation's drug czar appearing to have sex with a drug dealer; "Lolita," a film about a middle-aged man's obsession with a young girl; and "Titanic" [http://TitanicMovie.com], depicting a love affair by a young couple on a doomed ship.

He said each film showed simulated sexual activity by a minor. "Why am I not guilty under your interpretation of a federal crime?" Breyer asked lawyer for government Deputy Solicitor General Paul Clement.

Justice Antonin Scalia quickly interrupted, trying to assist Clement, saying the law defined specific sexual conduct, such as intercourse, masturbation, bestiality and showing of the genitals.

No Crime to Rent "Traffic"

"We're not prosecuting people who pick up 'Traffic' at the Blockbuster," Clement said, referring to the video rental chain.

The 1996 law covered any visual depiction "that appears to be a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." The law contained a provision prohibiting any visual depiction "that conveys the impression" of a minor engaging in such conduct.

The so-called "virtual" child pornography law makes it a crime to have computer-generated pictures of what appears to be minors engaging in sexual acts, even if the images do not involve real children.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said the Supreme Court previous rulings have held that the pornography actually harmed the child. "What is your primary reliance when you don't have that?" she asked Clement.

Justice John Paul Stevens asked whether Clement, an appointee of President Bush, felt the law would prohibit an 18-year-old from playing certain movie roles.

Clement replied that movie studios could simply not include scenes of sexually explicit conduct or could use a "body double" - another actress or actor to play the scene.

H. Louis Sirkin, representing a trade association of businesses involved in selling "adult-oriented materials" [http://FreeSpeechCoalition.com] argued the law should be struck down as a form of censorship that violates constitutional free-speech rights.

He said the law was too broad to pass constitutional muster. "It's a blanket, across-the-board prohibition," Sirkin said, adding that the law failed to make an exception for medical or scientific material.

As soon as Sirkin began his arguments, Scalia said: "I am trying to think of what great works of art would be taken away from us if we were unable to show minors copulating."

Stevens cited as a possible example the movie of the Shakespeare play about young lovers, "Romeo and Juliet."

Scalia responded: "You've seen a different version of that than I have."

The Supreme Court is expected to issue it's ruling early next year.

Chief Justice William Rehnquist opened the session by announcing the court would hear arguments at the U.S. courthouse on Wednesday for the third day in a row after anthrax was discovered in the court's basement mailroom.

Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content


See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

Planet Venus

The Hedge Against Exploitation

Performers File Unpaid Wage Claims

Danni Ashe Awarded

Carnal Comedy at Sapphires

XBIZ Trophy Girls

Hirsch XBIZ Keynote Speaker

Paul Fishbein Awarded

MWA: 12/26/15

New Wave Porn: BrightDesire.com

Star Studded: My Life in Porn

MWA: 12/10/15

Happy New Year 2016!

Jenna Jayden: New Boobs and Ready

MWA: 12/14/15

Amateur Allure 4 AVN Noms

MWA 12/13/15

Toy with Raquel Sultra

See Jack Napier

MWA: 12/02/15

Coming Out Like a Porn Star

Gone by Sssh.com

MWA: 11/17/15

Women Seeking Women Visited

Nikki Phoenix 3 AVN Noms

MWA: 11/12/15

Merry XXXmas, Happy Xanukkah

Public Sex Adventures 2

MWA: 11/11/15

Kendra Sunderland at Sapphire NYC

Sheri's Ranch Views Prostitutes

MWA: 11/10/15

Real Housewives Get Pipedream

Maryjean on Stern

MWA: 10/22/15

Gia Nova Vivid Radio Segment

Stories From

Law & Politics

Performers File Unpaid Wage Claims

Candidate Sex Tape Scandal

Donald Trump Porn Parody

Sex with Donald Trump

Hof Runs for Senate

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

Modern Comstockery

Hof on Phoenix Hooker Bust

Cal/OSHA vs Evil Angel

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit


Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Alia Janine Against Measure B

Fight Measure B

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).