Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world Elementary Public Relations Consulting and Press Release Service

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Nudist Vacations!

Join Tera Patrick

March 05, 2001 08:00am
Court Reviews Adult Businesses Law
Source: AP
by: Laurie Asseo

(WASHINGTON) -- The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take on a free-speech case and clarify what evidence of harmful effects cities must have to justify regulating the location of adult bookstores and video arcades.

The court said it will hear Los Angeles' argument that it provided enough evidence to warrant upholding an ordinance that banned adult bookstores and video arcades from operating at the same location.

Two adult businesses won a lower court ruling that barred enforcement of the law.

``There is no evidence that a combination adult bookstore/arcade produces any of the harmful secondary effects'' identified in a city study, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) said last August.

Los Angeles enacted an ordinance in 1978 requiring adult establishments to be at least 1,000 feet away from other such businesses and 500 feet away from any school, religious institution or public park.

The ordinance was based on a 1977 study that said concentrating adult businesses in a particular area led to increased crime, lower property values and other negative effects.

The law was amended in 1983 to prohibit operating more than one type of adult business in the same building, even if they were part of the same establishment. Adult bookstores and video arcades were to be considered separate businesses.

That ordinance was challenged in federal court by Alameda Books and Highland Books, which each operated adult bookstores and adult video arcades in the same location.

A federal judge ruled for the two businesses in 1998, and the 9th Circuit court agreed. Los Angeles has a ``substantial government interest'' in reducing crime in its neighborhoods, but it did not provide enough evidence that the restriction would serve that goal, the appeals court said.

``There is nothing in the case to indicate that the same type of behavior that occurs in viewing booths in combination bookstore/arcades would not occur in an establishment that only furnishes an arcade,'' the court said.

In the appeal granted Supreme Court review Monday, the city's lawyers said a 1984 Supreme Court ruling ``does not require a city council to independently investigate or corroborate each potential problem when it acts in furtherance of the public interest.''

The bookstores' lawyers said a zoning law like the Los Angeles ordinance ``would allow the absolute destruction of any adult bookstore business'' by defining each type of product as a separate business that could not occur in the same store.

The case is Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, 00-799.

Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content


See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

Daddy's Girls 2 ~ Reviewer Rated

Calvert Joins Gamelink

Interrogated ~ Reviewer Rated

1st AFFLV Hits Cashman

MWA: 09/11/15

Richelle Ryan Naked Yoga

Morgan, Lindemulder Headline Exxxotica

A French Documentary Like No Other

Night at the Erotic Museum

Hill and Howard Raw

Taboo is Delicious

Night, Rai, Moore, on Inside

Candida Royalle Passes

Cindy Starfall Appearances

Priya in NYC

More w/Mo Celebrates 100

Angel, Albrite AVN Awards Hosts

The Upward Trending Trannie

Elizabeth Bentley Hits Circuit

Tony Batman to Big Easy

Cleopatra Dead

Introducing Bitcoin Porn Sites

Candidate Sex Tape Scandal

Donald Trump Porn Parody

Savana Styles Available

MWA: 08/15/15

Sex with Donald Trump

MWA: 08/17/15

Ashley Sinclair Sex Tape

MWA: 08/12/15

Mercedes Carrera NightMoves Nom

Allie Haze in Columbus

Vivid NYC Nommed

Stories From

Law & Politics

Candidate Sex Tape Scandal

Donald Trump Porn Parody

Sex with Donald Trump

Hof Runs for Senate

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

Modern Comstockery

Hof on Phoenix Hooker Bust

Cal/OSHA vs Evil Angel

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit


Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Alia Janine Against Measure B

Fight Measure B

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

Copyright © 1998 - 2015 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).