Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
EXPO 2015, August 23-26, New Orleans
   
 

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Columns
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Interviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Nudist Vacations!

Kayden Kross at Twistys

March 05, 2001 08:00am
Court Reviews Adult Businesses Law
Source: AP
by: Laurie Asseo

(WASHINGTON) -- The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take on a free-speech case and clarify what evidence of harmful effects cities must have to justify regulating the location of adult bookstores and video arcades.

The court said it will hear Los Angeles' argument that it provided enough evidence to warrant upholding an ordinance that banned adult bookstores and video arcades from operating at the same location.

Two adult businesses won a lower court ruling that barred enforcement of the law.

``There is no evidence that a combination adult bookstore/arcade produces any of the harmful secondary effects'' identified in a city study, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) said last August.

Los Angeles enacted an ordinance in 1978 requiring adult establishments to be at least 1,000 feet away from other such businesses and 500 feet away from any school, religious institution or public park.

The ordinance was based on a 1977 study that said concentrating adult businesses in a particular area led to increased crime, lower property values and other negative effects.

The law was amended in 1983 to prohibit operating more than one type of adult business in the same building, even if they were part of the same establishment. Adult bookstores and video arcades were to be considered separate businesses.

That ordinance was challenged in federal court by Alameda Books and Highland Books, which each operated adult bookstores and adult video arcades in the same location.

A federal judge ruled for the two businesses in 1998, and the 9th Circuit court agreed. Los Angeles has a ``substantial government interest'' in reducing crime in its neighborhoods, but it did not provide enough evidence that the restriction would serve that goal, the appeals court said.

``There is nothing in the case to indicate that the same type of behavior that occurs in viewing booths in combination bookstore/arcades would not occur in an establishment that only furnishes an arcade,'' the court said.

In the appeal granted Supreme Court review Monday, the city's lawyers said a 1984 Supreme Court ruling ``does not require a city council to independently investigate or corroborate each potential problem when it acts in furtherance of the public interest.''

The bookstores' lawyers said a zoning law like the Los Angeles ordinance ``would allow the absolute destruction of any adult bookstore business'' by defining each type of product as a separate business that could not occur in the same store.

The case is Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, 00-799.



Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content

RavenBay02.3gp

See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

MWA: 05/22/15

Amateur Allure New Lines

Sin Claire with Foxxx

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

New Smash VP Wyatt Case

Ink Inks OC, The Rub

National Porn Star Day

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

XXX Casting Call

Direct Reps Harper

AJ Applegate Available

Emma Marx: Boundaries ~ Reviewer Rated

Strippers Ready for Baseball

MWA: 05/04/15

RAW Signs Sasha Bradshaw

Modern Comstockery

Nikki Phoenix Appearance

Rock’N’SeXXXy Welcomes Billy Blair

Karaoke XXX Needs New Location

Jane & Ward Hosting XRCO

SashaBrabuster's XXX Comeback

Control ~ Reviewer Rated

XRCO 2015 Nominees

A Leaner Message

MWA: 02/26/15

50 Shades of Grey ~ Cinema Seen

XRCO 2015 Hall of Fame

Interview with Ela Darling

Derrick Pierce Interview

The News Rack: Naked Swingers

MWA: 02/07/15

Interview of Holly Heart

ED Expo to Big Easy

More
Stories From

Law & Politics

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

Modern Comstockery

Hof on Phoenix Hooker Bust

Cal/OSHA vs Evil Angel

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit

ASACP at XBIZ 360

Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Alia Janine Against Measure B

Fight Measure B

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

John Stagliano Keynotes CatalystCon

Hirsch Blasts Trueman

Hirsch Cautions GOP

LATATA Files Injunction

Child Porn Hotline Increased

Vette Scores on AFF

Nicole Houde Assault Arrest

YouJizz Sued

Dickinson Defends Travolta

Kardashian/Humphries Divorce Deposition

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

     
Copyright © 1998 - 2015 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).